lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1618284955.25729.6.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date:   Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:35:55 +0800
From:   Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
To:     Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Tianping Fang <tianping.fang@...iatek.com>,
        Eddie Hung <eddie.hung@...iatek.com>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] usb: xhci-mtk: add support runtime PM

On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 13:14 +0800, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 4:54 PM Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 13:45 +0800, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 5:35 PM Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A dedicated wakeup irq will be used to handle runtime suspend/resume,
> > > > we use dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq API to take care of requesting
> > > > and attaching wakeup irq, then the suspend/resume framework will help
> > > > to enable/disable wakeup irq.
> > > >
> > > > The runtime PM is default off since some platforms may not support it.
> > > > users can enable it via power/control (set "auto") in sysfs.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > >  1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c
> > > > index a74764ab914a..30927f4064d4 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.c
[...]
> > > >
> > > > +static int check_rhub_status(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_hub *rhub)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       u32 suspended_ports;
> > > > +       u32 status;
> > > > +       int num_ports;
> > > > +       int i;
> > > > +
> > > > +       num_ports = rhub->num_ports;
> > > > +       suspended_ports = rhub->bus_state.suspended_ports;
> > > > +       for (i = 0; i < num_ports; i++) {
> > > > +               if (!(suspended_ports & BIT(i))) {
> > > > +                       status = readl(rhub->ports[i]->addr);
> > > > +                       if (status & PORT_CONNECT)
> > >
> > > So this pm_runtime support is activated only when there's no devices
> > > connected at all?
> > No, if the connected devices also support runtime suspend, it will enter
> > suspend mode when no data transfer, then the controller can enter
> > suspend too
> > > I think this will always return -EBUSY with my board having an on-board hub
> > > connected to both rhubs.
> > the on-board hub supports runtime suspend by default, so if no devices
> > connected, it will enter suspend
> 
> Sorry, you're correct. I was confused that the condition was
> (suspended && connect)
> My on-board hub connected to rhub is always in a suspended state
> whenever it's called.
> 
> However, I don't think this could return -EBUSY
> rpm_suspend() only be called when all the descendants are in sleep already.
You mean we can drop the bus check? 
If PM already takes care of children count, I think no need check it
anymore.
> Did you see any cases of this function returning -EBUSY or any concerns on here?
No, I didn't see it before.

Thanks

> 
> 
> >
> > >
> > > > +                               return -EBUSY;
> > > > +               }
> > > > +       }
> > > > +
> > > > +       return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * check the bus whether it could suspend or not
> > > > + * the bus will suspend if the downstream ports are already suspended,
> > > > + * or no devices connected.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static int check_bus_status(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +       ret = check_rhub_status(xhci, &xhci->usb3_rhub);
> > > > +       if (ret)
> > > > +               return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +       return check_rhub_status(xhci, &xhci->usb2_rhub);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int __maybe_unused xhci_mtk_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       struct xhci_hcd_mtk  *mtk = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > +       struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(mtk->hcd);
> > > > +       int ret = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (xhci->xhc_state)
> > > > +               return -ESHUTDOWN;
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
> > > > +               ret = check_bus_status(xhci);
> > > > +               if (!ret)
> > > > +                       ret = xhci_mtk_suspend(dev);
> > > > +       }
> > > > +
> > > > +       /* -EBUSY: let PM automatically reschedule another autosuspend */
> > > > +       return ret ? -EBUSY : 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int __maybe_unused xhci_mtk_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       struct xhci_hcd_mtk  *mtk = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > +       struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(mtk->hcd);
> > > > +       int ret = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (xhci->xhc_state)
> > > > +               return -ESHUTDOWN;
> > > > +
> > > > +       if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
> > > > +               ret = xhci_mtk_resume(dev);
> > > > +
> > > > +       return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >  static const struct dev_pm_ops xhci_mtk_pm_ops = {
> > > >         SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(xhci_mtk_suspend, xhci_mtk_resume)
> > > > +       SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(xhci_mtk_runtime_suspend,
> > > > +                          xhci_mtk_runtime_resume, NULL)
> > > >  };
> > > > -#define DEV_PM_OPS IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM) ? &xhci_mtk_pm_ops : NULL
> > > > +
> > > > +#define DEV_PM_OPS (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM) ? &xhci_mtk_pm_ops : NULL)
> > > >
> > > >  static const struct of_device_id mtk_xhci_of_match[] = {
> > > >         { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-xhci"},
> > > > --
> > > > 2.18.0
> > > >
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ