[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64670607.73039.1618341216196.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:13:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
paulmck <paulmck@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Arjun Roy <arjunroy@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] rseq: optimise rseq_get_rseq_cs() and
clear_rseq_cs()
----- On Apr 13, 2021, at 2:22 PM, Eric Dumazet edumazet@...gle.com wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:00 PM Mathieu Desnoyers
> <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
>>
>
>> As long as the ifdefs are localized within clearly identified wrappers in the
>> rseq code I don't mind doing the special-casing there.
>>
>> The point which remains is that I don't think we want to optimize for speed
>> on 32-bit architectures when it adds special-casing and complexity to the 32-bit
>> build. I suspect there is less and less testing performed on 32-bit
>> architectures
>> nowadays, and it's good that as much code as possible is shared between 32-bit
>> and
>> 64-bit builds to share the test coverage.
>>
>
> Quite frankly V1 was fine, I can't really make it looking better.
Yes, I'm OK with V1 of that patch.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists