linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 04/16] memory: mtk-smi: Add device-link between smi-larb and smi-common

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <1618293876.20053.19.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date:   Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:04:36 +0800
From:   Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
CC:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <youlin.pei@...iatek.com>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
        "Matthias Kaehlcke" <mka@...omium.org>, <anan.sun@...iatek.com>,
        <chao.hao@...iatek.com>, <ming-fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <yi.kuo@...iatek.com>, <eizan@...omium.org>,
        <acourbot@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/16] memory: mtk-smi: Add device-link between
 smi-larb and smi-common

On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 14:40 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/04/2021 11:11, Yong Wu wrote:
> > Normally, If the smi-larb HW need work, we should enable the smi-common
> > HW power and clock firstly.
> > This patch adds device-link between the smi-larb dev and the smi-common
> > dev. then If pm_runtime_get_sync(smi-larb-dev), the pm_runtime_get_sync
> > (smi-common-dev) will be called automatically.
> > 
> > Also, Add DL_FLAG_STATELESS to avoid the smi-common clocks be gated when
> > probe.
> > 
> > CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
> > Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> I understood this is a dependency for other patches, so:
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> 
> If I am wrong and I can take it via memory tree, let me know.

Hi Krzysztof,

Thanks very much for your quickly review.

I think it is ok if it go through memory tree. In the original patch, we
pm_runtime_get(smi-common-dev) in the smi-larb's pm resume callback.
This patch only use device-link do this. thus, this patch have no
function change. it only adjusts the SMI internal code flow.

In addition, [14/16] expects your Acked-by. and that one should be
merged with the others.

About the others patches, I'm not sure which tree they should go
through. they cross several trees, dt-binding/iommu/media/drm/dts.

Not sure if Matthias could have time to review and give some suggestion.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives