[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJvTdKmu-eWjSkBMgVh3BE6M38LPTSPk1oER2PKRQFUgqWYV6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 21:25:21 -0400
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-abi@...r.kernel.org,
"libc-alpha@...rceware.org" <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>,
Keno Fischer <keno@...iacomputing.com>
Subject: Re: Candidate Linux ABI for Intel AMX and hypothetical new related features
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 8:17 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> I'm fine with that as long the kernel has a way to detect that and can
> kill the offending application/library combo with an excplicit
> -SIG_NICE_TRY.
Agreed. The new run-time check for altsigstack overflow is one place
we can do that.
Let me know if you think of others,
thanks,
Len Brown,
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists