lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHWCZALi323oaGA5@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Apr 2021 13:37:08 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Mitali Borkar <mitaliborkar810@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com, mitali_s@...iitr.ac.in
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] staging: rtl8192e: Cleanup patchset for style
 issues in rtl819x_HTProc.c

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 04:15:03PM +0530, Mitali Borkar wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 09:52:48AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 08:55:03AM +0530, Mitali Borkar wrote:
> > > Changes from v4:-
> > > [PATCH v4 1/3]:- No changes.
> > > [PATCH v4 2/3]:- No changes.
> > > [PATCH V4 3/3]:- Removed casts and parentheses.
> > 
> > This series does not apply cleanly, please rebase and resend.
> >
> Resend as v6? Does not apply cleanly as in? Were mails not threaded
> properly?

Yes, send a v6, after rebasing on my tree and the staging-testing branch
and resend.

They were threaded properly, it looks like others have made changes to
the same files that you were, which is quite common when doing small
cleanup changes like this.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ