[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALvZod6P4O8JicK22=RfjLk205kTDNDV=WonO0yXE0Fx7ydsGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 06:28:09 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
fam.zheng@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] mm: memcontrol: simplify lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 11:57 PM Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> We already have a helper lruvec_memcg() to get the memcg from lruvec, we
> do not need to do it ourselves in the lruvec_holds_page_lru_lock(). So use
> lruvec_memcg() instead. And if mem_cgroup_disabled() returns false, the
> page_memcg(page) (the LRU pages) cannot be NULL. So remove the odd logic
> of "memcg = page_memcg(page) ? : root_mem_cgroup". And use lruvec_pgdat
> to simplify the code. We can have a single definition for this function
> that works for !CONFIG_MEMCG, CONFIG_MEMCG + mem_cgroup_disabled() and
> CONFIG_MEMCG.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists