lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <25494bef6b6a109ee1aab622151db8c4bf74bfeb.1618322003.git.maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:10:08 +0200
From:   "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] KVM: Integrate gfn_to_memslot_approx() into search_memslots()

From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>

s390 arch has gfn_to_memslot_approx() which is almost identical to
search_memslots(), differing only in that in case the gfn falls in a hole
one of the memslots bordering the hole is returned.

Add this lookup mode as an option to search_memslots() so we don't have two
almost identical functions for looking up a memslot by its gfn.

Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c    |  2 +-
 arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c |  2 +-
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c            | 39 ++---------------------------
 include/linux/kvm_host.h            | 13 +++++++---
 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
index 8da93fdfa59e..148525120504 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static long kvmppc_tce_to_ua(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long tce,
 	unsigned long gfn = tce >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
 
-	memslot = search_memslots(kvm_memslots(kvm), gfn);
+	memslot = search_memslots(kvm_memslots(kvm), gfn, false);
 	if (!memslot)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c
index 083a4e037718..a4042403630d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio_hv.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static long kvmppc_rm_tce_to_ua(struct kvm *kvm,
 	unsigned long gfn = tce >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
 
-	memslot = search_memslots(kvm_memslots_raw(kvm), gfn);
+	memslot = search_memslots(kvm_memslots_raw(kvm), gfn, false);
 	if (!memslot)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 2f09e9d7dc95..62491ec003d8 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -1912,41 +1912,6 @@ static long kvm_s390_set_skeys(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_skeys *args)
 /* for consistency */
 #define KVM_S390_CMMA_SIZE_MAX ((u32)KVM_S390_SKEYS_MAX)
 
-/*
- * Similar to gfn_to_memslot, but returns the index of a memslot also when the
- * address falls in a hole. In that case the index of one of the memslots
- * bordering the hole is returned.
- */
-static int gfn_to_memslot_approx(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
-{
-	int start = 0, end = slots->used_slots;
-	int slot = atomic_read(&slots->lru_slot);
-	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslots = slots->memslots;
-
-	if (gfn >= memslots[slot].base_gfn &&
-	    gfn < memslots[slot].base_gfn + memslots[slot].npages)
-		return slot;
-
-	while (start < end) {
-		slot = start + (end - start) / 2;
-
-		if (gfn >= memslots[slot].base_gfn)
-			end = slot;
-		else
-			start = slot + 1;
-	}
-
-	if (start >= slots->used_slots)
-		return slots->used_slots - 1;
-
-	if (gfn >= memslots[start].base_gfn &&
-	    gfn < memslots[start].base_gfn + memslots[start].npages) {
-		atomic_set(&slots->lru_slot, start);
-	}
-
-	return start;
-}
-
 static int kvm_s390_peek_cmma(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_cmma_log *args,
 			      u8 *res, unsigned long bufsize)
 {
@@ -1973,8 +1938,8 @@ static int kvm_s390_peek_cmma(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s390_cmma_log *args,
 static unsigned long kvm_s390_next_dirty_cmma(struct kvm_memslots *slots,
 					      unsigned long cur_gfn)
 {
-	int slotidx = gfn_to_memslot_approx(slots, cur_gfn);
-	struct kvm_memory_slot *ms = slots->memslots + slotidx;
+	struct kvm_memory_slot *ms = search_memslots(slots, cur_gfn, true);
+	int slotidx = ms - slots->memslots;
 	unsigned long ofs = cur_gfn - ms->base_gfn;
 
 	if (ms->base_gfn + ms->npages <= cur_gfn) {
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 3b06d12ec37e..6664aa10db93 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -1084,10 +1084,14 @@ bool kvm_arch_irqfd_allowed(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irqfd *args);
  * gfn_to_memslot() itself isn't here as an inline because that would
  * bloat other code too much.
  *
+ * With "approx" set returns the memslot also when the address falls
+ * in a hole. In that case one of the memslots bordering the hole is
+ * returned.
+ *
  * IMPORTANT: Slots are sorted from highest GFN to lowest GFN!
  */
 static inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
-search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
+search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn, bool approx)
 {
 	int start = 0, end = slots->used_slots;
 	int slot = atomic_read(&slots->lru_slot);
@@ -1109,19 +1113,22 @@ search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
 			start = slot + 1;
 	}
 
+	if (approx && start >= slots->used_slots)
+		return &memslots[slots->used_slots - 1];
+
 	if (start < slots->used_slots && gfn >= memslots[start].base_gfn &&
 	    gfn < memslots[start].base_gfn + memslots[start].npages) {
 		atomic_set(&slots->lru_slot, start);
 		return &memslots[start];
 	}
 
-	return NULL;
+	return approx ? &memslots[start] : NULL;
 }
 
 static inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
 __gfn_to_memslot(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
 {
-	return search_memslots(slots, gfn);
+	return search_memslots(slots, gfn, false);
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ