lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:55:15 +0100
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
        mgorman@...e.de, juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        bristot@...hat.com, joshdon@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, greg@...ah.com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] sched,debug: Convert sysctl sched_domains to debugfs

On 12/04/21 12:14, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Stop polluting sysctl, move to debugfs for SCHED_DEBUG stuff.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>

On my Juno (2+4 big.LITTLE), sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains/ is now empty.

I think that's because of unregister_sched_domain_sysctl() -
debugfs_remove() is recursive, and I do get a case where we rebuild the
domains but no CPU has been added or removed (we rebuild the domains when
cpufreq kicks in, it's part of the big.LITTLE ponies).

Do we actually still need that unregister? From a brief glance it looks
like we could throw it out.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ