[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3b5b48a-82dc-361b-91f7-df0a73629b67@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 16:58:03 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, youlin.pei@...iatek.com,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>, anan.sun@...iatek.com,
chao.hao@...iatek.com, ming-fan.chen@...iatek.com,
yi.kuo@...iatek.com, eizan@...omium.org, acourbot@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/16] memory: mtk-smi: Add device-link between
smi-larb and smi-common
On 13/04/2021 08:04, Yong Wu wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 14:40 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 10/04/2021 11:11, Yong Wu wrote:
>>> Normally, If the smi-larb HW need work, we should enable the smi-common
>>> HW power and clock firstly.
>>> This patch adds device-link between the smi-larb dev and the smi-common
>>> dev. then If pm_runtime_get_sync(smi-larb-dev), the pm_runtime_get_sync
>>> (smi-common-dev) will be called automatically.
>>>
>>> Also, Add DL_FLAG_STATELESS to avoid the smi-common clocks be gated when
>>> probe.
>>>
>>> CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
>>> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> I understood this is a dependency for other patches, so:
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
>>
>> If I am wrong and I can take it via memory tree, let me know.
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Thanks very much for your quickly review.
>
> I think it is ok if it go through memory tree. In the original patch, we
> pm_runtime_get(smi-common-dev) in the smi-larb's pm resume callback.
> This patch only use device-link do this. thus, this patch have no
> function change. it only adjusts the SMI internal code flow.
Hm, okay, I took it then for v5.13.
>
> In addition, [14/16] expects your Acked-by. and that one should be
> merged with the others.
Thanks for reminder.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists