linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] soundwire: Intel: introduce DMI quirks for HP Spectre x360 Convertible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YHZqqjUSJvYxhEw6@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date:   Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:38:10 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
        rander.wang@...ux.intel.com, hui.wang@...onical.com,
        sanyog.r.kale@...el.com, bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] soundwire: Intel: introduce DMI quirks for HP
 Spectre x360 Convertible

On 12-04-21, 14:37, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 3/1/21 11:51 PM, Bard Liao wrote:
> > +++ b/drivers/soundwire/dmi-quirks.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause)
> > +// Copyright(c) 2021 Intel Corporation.
> 
> It looks like this is already in intel-next, so this may be moot.  But,
> is there a specific reason this is dual licensed?  If so, can you please
> include information about the license choice in the cover letter of any
> future version?

The soundwire module from Intel and core soundwire core was always dual
licensed, so it kind of followed that..

> If there is no specific reason for this contribution to be dual
> licensed, please make it GPL-2.0 only.

This module, I would say NO. Unless someone from Intel disagree..
Pierre/Bard..?

If all agree I dont see a reason why this cant be updated to GPL only.

Thanks
-- 
~Vinod