linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Don't play dirty trick with const

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210414211916.GS4869@dell>
Date:   Wed, 14 Apr 2021 22:19:16 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: Don't play dirty trick
 with const

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 06:13:19PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > 
> > > > As Linus rightfully noticed, the driver plays dirty trick with const,
> > > > i.e. it assigns a place holder data structure to the const field
> > > > in the MFD cell and then drops the const by explicit casting. This is
> > > > not how it should be.
> > > > 
> > > > Assign local pointers of the cell and resource to the respective
> > > > non-const place holders in the intel_quark_i2c_setup() and
> > > > intel_quark_gpio_setup().
> > > > 
> > > > Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > v2: eliminated bar parameter (Lee)
> > > >  drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Neat.
> > > 
> > > Applied, thanks.
> > 
> > Am I still missing patches from you Andy?
> 
> Patches for fixes should be applied to for-next as well. I don't know why with
> my patches it diverged.
> 
> I have already commented on this when kbuild bot complained.
> 
> So,
> 
> 	git checkout for-mfd-next
> 	git merge for-mfd-fixes
> 
> or equivalent (cherry-pick) will fix that.

Ah, it's in -rc5.  Very good.  Thanks for the explanation.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog