[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7854092f-f37a-f95c-132a-1b2896d582fc@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:25:20 +0800
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...wei.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<hpa@...or.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Accelerate copy_page with non-temporal in X86
on 2021/4/13 22:53, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> I thought "should be better" too last time when I measured rep; movs vs
> NT stores but actual measurements showed no real difference.
Mabye the NT stores make difference when store to slow dimms, like the
persistent memory I just tested. Also, it likely reduces unnecessary cache
load and flush, and benifits the running processes which have data cached.
--
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists