lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:58:08 +0000
From:   "Zhang, Qiang" <Qiang.Zhang@...driver.com>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
CC:     Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>,
        "andreyknvl@...il.com" <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        "ryabinin.a.a@...il.com" <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kasan-dev@...glegroups.com" <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
Subject: 回复: Question on KASAN calltrace record in RT



________________________________________
发件人: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
发送时间: 2021年4月13日 23:29
收件人: Zhang, Qiang
抄送: Andrew Halaney; andreyknvl@...il.com; ryabinin.a.a@...il.com; akpm@...ux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; kasan-dev@...glegroups.com
主题: Re: Question on KASAN calltrace record in RT

[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:26 AM Zhang, Qiang <Qiang.Zhang@...driver.com> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone
>
> In RT system,   after  Andrew test,   found the following calltrace ,
> in KASAN, we record callstack through stack_depot_save(), in this function, may be call alloc_pages,  but in RT, the spin_lock replace with
> rt_mutex in alloc_pages(), if before call this function, the irq is disabled,
> will trigger following calltrace.
>
> maybe  add array[KASAN_STACK_DEPTH] in struct kasan_track to record callstack  in RT system.
>
> Is there a better solution ?

>Hi Qiang,
>
>Adding 2 full stacks per heap object can increase memory usage too >much.
>The stackdepot has a preallocation mechanism, I would start with
>adding interrupts check here:
>https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.12-rc7/source/lib/stackdepot.c#L294
>and just not do preallocation in interrupt context. This will solve
>the problem, right?

It seems to be useful,  however, there are the following situations 
If there is a lot of stack information that needs to be saved in  interrupts,  the memory which has been allocated to hold the stack information is depletion,   when need to save stack again in interrupts,  there will be no memory available .

Thanks
Qiang
 

> Thanks
> Qiang
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:951
> [   14.522262] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 640, name: mount
> [   14.522304] Call Trace:
> [   14.522306]  dump_stack+0x92/0xc1
> [   14.522313]  ___might_sleep.cold.99+0x1b0/0x1ef
> [   14.522319]  rt_spin_lock+0x3e/0xc0
> [   14.522329]  local_lock_acquire+0x52/0x3c0
> [   14.522332]  get_page_from_freelist+0x176c/0x3fd0
> [   14.522543]  __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x28f/0x7f0
> [   14.522559]  stack_depot_save+0x3a1/0x470
> [   14.522564]  kasan_save_stack+0x2f/0x40
> [   14.523575]  kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
> [   14.523580]  insert_work+0x48/0x340
> [   14.523589]  __queue_work+0x430/0x1280
> [   14.523595]  mod_delayed_work_on+0x98/0xf0
> [   14.523607]  kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on+0x17/0x20
> [   14.523611]  blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x151/0x2b0
> [   14.523620]  blk_mq_sched_insert_request+0x2ad/0x470
> [   14.523633]  blk_mq_submit_bio+0xd2a/0x2330
> [   14.523675]  submit_bio_noacct+0x8aa/0xfe0
> [   14.523693]  submit_bio+0xf0/0x550
> [   14.523714]  submit_bio_wait+0xfe/0x200
> [   14.523724]  xfs_rw_bdev+0x370/0x480 [xfs]
> [   14.523831]  xlog_do_io+0x155/0x320 [xfs]
> [   14.524032]  xlog_bread+0x23/0xb0 [xfs]
> [   14.524133]  xlog_find_head+0x131/0x8b0 [xfs]
> [   14.524375]  xlog_find_tail+0xc8/0x7b0 [xfs]
> [   14.524828]  xfs_log_mount+0x379/0x660 [xfs]
> [   14.524927]  xfs_mountfs+0xc93/0x1af0 [xfs]
> [   14.525424]  xfs_fs_fill_super+0x923/0x17f0 [xfs]
> [   14.525522]  get_tree_bdev+0x404/0x680
> [   14.525622]  vfs_get_tree+0x89/0x2d0
> [   14.525628]  path_mount+0xeb2/0x19d0
> [   14.525648]  do_mount+0xcb/0xf0
> [   14.525665]  __x64_sys_mount+0x162/0x1b0
> [   14.525670]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
> [   14.525674]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> [   14.525677] RIP: 0033:0x7fd6c15eaade

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ