[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210414012134.128066-1-yuchao0@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:21:34 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <chao@...nel.org>,
Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to cover allocate_segment() with lock
As we did for other cases, in fix_curseg_write_pointer(), let's
change as below:
- use callback function s_ops->allocate_segment() instead of
raw function allocate_segment_by_default();
- cover allocate_segment() with curseg_lock and sentry_lock.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index b2ee6b7791b0..daf9531ec58f 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -4848,7 +4848,12 @@ static int fix_curseg_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
f2fs_notice(sbi, "Assign new section to curseg[%d]: "
"curseg[0x%x,0x%x]", type, cs->segno, cs->next_blkoff);
- allocate_segment_by_default(sbi, type, true);
+
+ down_read(&SM_I(sbi)->curseg_lock);
+ down_write(&SIT_I(sbi)->sentry_lock);
+ SIT_I(sbi)->s_ops->allocate_segment(sbi, type, true);
+ up_write(&SIT_I(sbi)->sentry_lock);
+ up_read(&SM_I(sbi)->curseg_lock);
/* check consistency of the zone curseg pointed to */
if (check_zone_write_pointer(sbi, zbd, &zone))
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists