[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44bdf1f1-117d-0f10-fc59-9edd32d1ad61@csgroup.eu>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:10:42 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Brian Cain <bcain@...eaurora.org>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@...el.com>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
Cc: uclinux-h8-devel@...ts.sourceforge.jp,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: consolidate trap_init()
Le 14/04/2021 à 10:58, Jisheng Zhang a écrit :
> Many architectures implement the trap_init() as NOP, since there is
> no such default for trap_init(), this empty stub is duplicated among
> these architectures. Provide a generic but weak NOP implementation
> to drop the empty stubs of trap_init() in these architectures.
You define the weak function in the __init section.
Most but not all architectures had it in __init section.
And the remaining ones may not be defined in __init section. For instance look at the one in alpha
architecture.
Have you checked that it is not a problem ? It would be good to say something about it in the commit
description.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
> ---
> arch/arc/kernel/traps.c | 5 -----
> arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 5 -----
> arch/h8300/kernel/traps.c | 13 -------------
> arch/hexagon/kernel/traps.c | 4 ----
> arch/nds32/kernel/traps.c | 5 -----
> arch/nios2/kernel/traps.c | 5 -----
> arch/openrisc/kernel/traps.c | 5 -----
> arch/parisc/kernel/traps.c | 4 ----
> arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 5 -----
> arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 5 -----
> arch/um/kernel/trap.c | 4 ----
> init/main.c | 2 ++
> 12 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 53b278845b88..4bdbe2928530 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -790,6 +790,8 @@ static inline void initcall_debug_enable(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> +void __init __weak trap_init(void) { }
> +
I think in a C file we don't try to save space as much as in a header file.
I would prefer something like:
void __init __weak trap_init(void)
{
}
> /* Report memory auto-initialization states for this boot. */
> static void __init report_meminit(void)
> {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists