linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/sva: Remove mm parameter from SVA bind API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210414112602.GA1370958@nvidia.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Apr 2021 08:26:02 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
        Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, wangzhou1@...ilicon.com,
        zhangfei.gao@...aro.org, vkoul@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/sva: Remove mm parameter from SVA bind API

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 02:22:09PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:

> I still worry about supervisor pasid allocation.
> 
> If we use iommu_sva_alloc_pasid() to allocate a supervisor pasid, which
> mm should the pasid be set? I've ever thought about passing &init_mm to
> iommu_sva_alloc_pasid(). But if you add "mm != current->mm", this seems
> not to work. Or do you prefer a separated interface for supervisor pasid
> allocation/free?

Without a mm_struct it is not SVA, so don't use SVA APIs for whatever
a 'supervisor pasid' is

Jason