[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210414022229.5469-1-qianjun.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:22:29 +0800
From: qianjun.kernel@...il.com
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jun qian <qianjun.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/1] sched/fair:Reduce unnecessary check preempt in the sched tick
From: jun qian <qianjun.kernel@...il.com>
As you are already set the TIF_NEED_RESCHED, there is no need
to check resched again.
Signed-off-by: jun qian <qianjun.kernel@...il.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 794c2cb945f8..1a69b5fffe4a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4360,19 +4360,26 @@ check_preempt_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
{
unsigned long ideal_runtime, delta_exec;
struct sched_entity *se;
+ struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
s64 delta;
ideal_runtime = sched_slice(cfs_rq, curr);
delta_exec = curr->sum_exec_runtime - curr->prev_sum_exec_runtime;
if (delta_exec > ideal_runtime) {
- resched_curr(rq_of(cfs_rq));
+ if (!test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr))
+ resched_curr(rq_of(cfs_rq));
/*
* The current task ran long enough, ensure it doesn't get
* re-elected due to buddy favours.
*/
clear_buddies(cfs_rq, curr);
return;
- }
+ /*
+ * If here with TIF_NEED_RESCHED already set from the early entity_tick,
+ * there is no need to check again.
+ */
+ } else if (test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr))
+ return;
/*
* Ensure that a task that missed wakeup preemption by a
--
2.18.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists