[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9cedd64c-5585-353b-4f8b-eab245950d0f@csgroup.eu>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:57:57 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, jniethe5@...il.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc: Rename probe_kernel_read_inst()
Le 14/04/2021 à 07:23, Aneesh Kumar K.V a écrit :
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> writes:
>
>> When probe_kernel_read_inst() was created, it was to mimic
>> probe_kernel_read() function.
>>
>> Since then, probe_kernel_read() has been renamed
>> copy_from_kernel_nofault().
>>
>> Rename probe_kernel_read_inst() into copy_from_kernel_nofault_inst().
>
> At first glance I read it as copy from kernel nofault instruction.
> How about copy_inst_from_kernel_nofault()?
Yes good idea.
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists