[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHcDyUap4cU8WNh6@builder.lan>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:01:29 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] remoteproc: stm32: add capability to detach
On Wed 14 Apr 02:23 CDT 2021, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
> On 4/13/21 11:34 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Wed 31 Mar 02:33 CDT 2021, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
[..]
> >> + err = mbox_send_message(ddata->mb[idx].chan,
> >> + &dummy_data);
> >
> > Seems I posted my comment on v1, rather than this latest version. Please
> > let me know if we should do anything about this dummy_data.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out, you are right, the mailbox driver is stm32_ipcc
> and it only sends a signal to the remote processor.
>
> As message can be queued by the mailbox framework using a local variable seems
> not a good option. As this code is a copy/past of the kick and stop?
> I propose to get this one and I will send a new patch to fix the usage in the
> whole driver.
>
That works for me, I've merged the two patches.
Thanks,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists