lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:50:16 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
Cc:     kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
        wei.liu@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        konrad.wilk@...cle.com, hch@....de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
        robin.murphy@....com, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, vkuznets@...hat.com,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com,
        sunilmut@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [Resend RFC PATCH V2 11/12] HV/Netvsc: Add Isolation VM
 support for netvsc driver

> +struct dma_range {
> +	dma_addr_t dma;
> +	u32 mapping_size;
> +};

That's a rather generic name that is bound to create a conflict sooner
or later.

>  #include "hyperv_net.h"
>  #include "netvsc_trace.h"
> +#include "../../hv/hyperv_vmbus.h"

Please move public interfaces out of the private header rather than doing
this.

> +	if (hv_isolation_type_snp()) {
> +		area = get_vm_area(buf_size, VM_IOREMAP);

Err, no.  get_vm_area is private a for a reason.

> +		if (!area)
> +			goto cleanup;
> +
> +		vaddr = (unsigned long)area->addr;
> +		for (i = 0; i < buf_size / HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE; i++) {
> +			extra_phys = (virt_to_hvpfn(net_device->recv_buf + i * HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE)
> +				<< HV_HYP_PAGE_SHIFT) + ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary;
> +			ret |= ioremap_page_range(vaddr + i * HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE,
> +					   vaddr + (i + 1) * HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE,
> +					   extra_phys, PAGE_KERNEL_IO);
> +		}
> +
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto cleanup;

And this is not something a driver should ever do.  I think you are badly
reimplementing functionality that should be in the dma coherent allocator
here.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ