[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <161850887861.19953.221061108559265600.b4-ty@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:48:29 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Jian Cai <jiancai@...gle.com>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif}
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:08:04 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After commit 2decad92f473 ("arm64: mte: Ensure TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT is
> set atomically"), LLVM's integrated assembler fails to build entry.S:
>
> <instantiation>:5:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression
> .org . - (664b-663b) + (662b-661b)
> ^
> <instantiation>:6:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression
> .org . - (662b-661b) + (664b-663b)
> ^
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/1] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif}
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/22315a2296f4
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists