linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: s3c64xx: simplify getting of_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <161851161879.23304.6673914019585638025.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:33:42 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <snawrocki@...nel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: s3c64xx: simplify getting of_device_id match data

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 22:33:41 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Use of_device_get_match_data() to make the code slightly smaller and to
> remove the of_device_id table forward declaration.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] spi: s3c64xx: simplify getting of_device_id match data
      commit: 609a2f9529d3d3e627776614b6cff34b21f64144
[2/3] spi: s3c64xx: correct kerneldoc of s3c64xx_spi_port_config
      commit: 7d712f799a938b37d24359ea836f58866be5e0bb
[3/3] spi: s3c64xx: constify driver/match data
      commit: d6371415517700ae225dd1aaa8a35a86a659ada6

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark