[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHiPZCjChv2iZ4/y@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 22:09:24 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a77970: Add csi40 port@0
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:47:48PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:47 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 02:25:59PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > > Declare port@0 in the csi40 device node and leave it un-connected.
> > > Each board .dts file will connect the port as it requires.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
> >
> > The port exists at the hardware level, so including it here sounds good.
> > The DT binding even makes the port mandatory :-)
>
> But the latter is subject to change?
>
> [PATCH] media: dt-bindings: media: renesas,csi2: Node port@0 is not mandatory
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20210413155346.2471776-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se/
I've replied to that patch, it's not a good idea.
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77970.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77970.dtsi
> > > @@ -1106,6 +1106,10 @@ ports {
> > > #address-cells = <1>;
> > > #size-cells = <0>;
> > >
> > > + port@0 {
> > > + reg = <0>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > port@1 {
> > > #address-cells = <1>;
> > > #size-cells = <0>;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists