[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210415054851.GA6021@kadam>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:48:51 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Aline Santana Cordeiro <alinesantanacordeiro@...il.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: media: atomisp: pci: Format comments
according to coding-style in file atomisp_cmd.c
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 05:42:44PM -0300, Aline Santana Cordeiro wrote:
> @@ -90,18 +92,14 @@ struct camera_mipi_info *atomisp_to_sensor_mipi_info(struct v4l2_subdev *sd)
> return (struct camera_mipi_info *)v4l2_get_subdev_hostdata(sd);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * get struct atomisp_video_pipe from v4l2 video_device
> - */
> +/* get struct atomisp_video_pipe from v4l2 video_device */
This code is obvious and the comment doesn't add anything except noise.
Just delete it. Same for a lot of the other one line comments
describing functions in this patch.
> struct atomisp_video_pipe *atomisp_to_video_pipe(struct video_device *dev)
> {
> return (struct atomisp_video_pipe *)
> container_of(dev, struct atomisp_video_pipe, vdev);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * get struct atomisp_acc_pipe from v4l2 video_device
> - */
> +/* get struct atomisp_acc_pipe from v4l2 video_device */
> struct atomisp_acc_pipe *atomisp_to_acc_pipe(struct video_device *dev)
> {
> return (struct atomisp_acc_pipe *)
> @@ -269,7 +267,7 @@ int atomisp_freq_scaling(struct atomisp_device *isp,
> ATOMISP_RUN_MODE_CONTINUOUS_CAPTURE;
> }
>
> - /* search for the target frequency by looping freq rules*/
> + /* search for the target frequency by looping freq rules */
> for (i = 0; i < dfs->dfs_table_size; i++) {
> if (curr_rules.width != dfs->dfs_table[i].width &&
> dfs->dfs_table[i].width != ISP_FREQ_RULE_ANY)
> @@ -307,9 +305,7 @@ int atomisp_freq_scaling(struct atomisp_device *isp,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * reset and restore ISP
> - */
> +/* reset and restore ISP */
Obvious
> int atomisp_reset(struct atomisp_device *isp)
> {
> /* Reset ISP by power-cycling it */
> @@ -338,9 +334,7 @@ int atomisp_reset(struct atomisp_device *isp)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * interrupt disable functions
> - */
> +/* interrupt disable functions */
Obvious
> static void disable_isp_irq(enum hrt_isp_css_irq irq)
> {
> irq_disable_channel(IRQ0_ID, irq);
> @@ -351,9 +345,7 @@ static void disable_isp_irq(enum hrt_isp_css_irq irq)
> cnd_sp_irq_enable(SP0_ID, false);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * interrupt clean function
> - */
> +/* interrupt clean function */
Obvious
> static void clear_isp_irq(enum hrt_isp_css_irq irq)
> {
> irq_clear_all(IRQ0_ID);
[ snip ]
> @@ -1918,10 +1914,7 @@ irqreturn_t atomisp_isr_thread(int irq, void *isp_ptr)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * utils for buffer allocation/free
> - */
> -
> +/* utils for buffer allocation/free */
What? This one seems actively wrong.
> int atomisp_get_frame_pgnr(struct atomisp_device *isp,
> const struct ia_css_frame *frame, u32 *p_pgnr)
> {
etc.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists