lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210415164734.1143f20d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:47:34 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfio tree with the drm tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfio tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gvt.c

between commit:

  9ff06c385300 ("drm/i915/gvt: Remove references to struct drm_device.pdev")

from the drm tree and commit:

  383987fd15ba ("vfio/gvt: Use mdev_get_type_group_id()")

from the vfio tree.

I fixed it up (I used the latter version) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ