[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHfmx2j6kj16gYtO@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:09:59 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc: guro@...com, hannes@...xchg.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shakeelb@...gle.com, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
duanxiongchun@...edance.com, fam.zheng@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 2/7] mm: memcontrol: bail out early when
!mm in get_mem_cgroup_from_mm
On Thu 15-04-21 11:13:16, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 6:15 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 14-04-21 18:04:35, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 5:24 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue 13-04-21 14:51:48, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > > > When mm is NULL, we do not need to hold rcu lock and call css_tryget for
> > > > > the root memcg. And we also do not need to check !mm in every loop of
> > > > > while. So bail out early when !mm.
> > > >
> > > > mem_cgroup_charge and other callers unconditionally drop the reference
> > > > so how come this does not underflow reference count?
> > >
> > > For the root memcg, the CSS_NO_REF flag is set, so css_get
> > > and css_put do not get or put reference.
> >
> > Ohh, right you are. I must have forgot about that special case. I am
> > pretty sure I (and likely few more) will stumble over that in the future
> > again. A small comment explaining that the reference can be safely
> > ignore would be helpful.
>
> OK. Will do.
I would go with the following if that helps
/*
* No need to css_get on root memcg as the reference counting is
* disabled on the root level in the cgroup core. See CSS_NO_REF
*/
Thanks
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists