[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210415081828.GD1006@kunai>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:18:28 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Jie Deng <jie.deng@...el.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
conghui.chen@...el.com, kblaiech@...lanox.com,
jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
Sergey Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, loic.poulain@...aro.org,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
yu1.wang@...el.com, shuo.a.liu@...el.com,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 04:15:07PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
> On 2021/4/15 15:28, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > > Now that we were able to catch you, I will use the opportunity to
> > > clarify the doubts I had.
> > >
> > > - struct mutex lock in struct virtio_i2c, I don't think this is
> > > required since the core takes care of locking in absence of this.
> > This is likely correct.
>
> OK. Then I will remove the lock.
Let me have a look first, please.
> > > - Use of I2C_CLASS_DEPRECATED flag, I don't think it is required for
> > > new drivers.
> > This is definately correct :)
>
> Do you mean a new driver doesn't need to set the following ?
>
> vi->adap.class = I2C_CLASS_DEPRECATED;
>
> Just leave the class to be 0 ?
Yes. DEPRECATED is only for drivers which used to have a class and then
chose to remove it.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists