[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHgDUEX7ogOkb60O@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:11:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [peterz-queue:perf/core 18/22] kernel/events/core.c:6418:22:
sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:03:09AM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:48AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I've ended up with the below delta, does that work for you?
>
> Thanks, that works for me. Do note that I explicitly chose u64 for
> sig_addr/pending_addr because data->addr is u64. There might be a new
> warning about the u64 to unsigned long assignment on 32 bit arches.
My local i386-defconfig build seemed happy now. Mostly I think you're
allowed to silently truncate between base integer types. We'll see..
maybe some other compiler.
> Perhaps it needs something ugly like this:
>
> info.si_addr = (void __user *)(unsigned long)event->pending_addr;
>
> if pending_addr wants to be u64. Or just
>
> event->pending_addr = (unsigned long)data->addr;
>
> if data->addr being u64 on 32 bit arches is simply overkill.
Yeah it is. It's u64 for data layout purposes, the perf buffer works in
u64 chunks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists