[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b652e6a6-0f4f-27d1-0a5e-6b86676ca08e@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:19:34 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<mhocko@...e.com>, <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, <vbabka@...e.cz>,
<alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>, <willy@...radead.org>,
<minchan@...nel.org>, <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
<hughd@...gle.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] swap: fix do_swap_page() race with swapoff
On 2021/4/15 0:13, Tim Chen wrote:
>
>
> On 4/13/21 6:04 PM, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 4/12/21 6:27 PM, Huang, Ying wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> This isn't the commit that introduces the race. You can use `git blame`
>>>> find out the correct commit. For this it's commit 0bcac06f27d7 "mm,
>>>> swap: skip swapcache for swapin of synchronous device".
>>>>
>>>> And I suggest to merge 1/5 and 2/5 to make it easy to get the full
>>>> picture.
>>>
>>> I'll suggest make fix to do_swap_page race with get/put_swap_device
>>> as a first patch. Then the per_cpu_ref stuff in patch 1 and patch 2 can
>>> be combined together.
>>
>> The original get/put_swap_device() use rcu_read_lock/unlock(). I don't
>> think it's good to wrap swap_read_page() with it. After all, some
>> complex operations are done in swap_read_page(), including
>> blk_io_schedule().
>>
>
> In that case then have the patches to make get/put_swap_device to use
> percpu_ref first. And the patch to to fix the race in do_swap_page
> later in another patch.
>
> Patch 2 is mixing the two.
>
Looks like a good way to organize this patch series. Many thanks!
> Tim
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists