[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210415142552.30916-1-alisaidi@amazon.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:25:52 +0000
From: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <alisaidi@...zon.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<steve.capper@....com>, <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] locking/qrwlock: Fix ordering in queued_write_lock_slowpath
While this code is executed with the wait_lock held, a reader can
acquire the lock without holding wait_lock. The writer side loops
checking the value with the atomic_cond_read_acquire(), but only truly
acquires the lock when the compare-and-exchange is completed
successfully which isn’t ordered. The other atomic operations from this
point are release-ordered and thus reads after the lock acquisition can
be completed before the lock is truly acquired which violates the
guarantees the lock should be making.
Fixes: b519b56e378ee ("locking/qrwlock: Use atomic_cond_read_acquire() when spinning in qrwloc")
Signed-off-by: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@...zon.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
kernel/locking/qrwlock.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
index 4786dd271b45..10770f6ac4d9 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ void queued_write_lock_slowpath(struct qrwlock *lock)
/* When no more readers or writers, set the locked flag */
do {
- atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->cnts, VAL == _QW_WAITING);
- } while (atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->cnts, _QW_WAITING,
+ atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&lock->cnts, VAL == _QW_WAITING);
+ } while (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->cnts, _QW_WAITING,
_QW_LOCKED) != _QW_WAITING);
unlock:
arch_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
--
2.24.4.AMZN
Powered by blists - more mailing lists