[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f85b1db2-3a0b-0de3-78e9-2c04721f00bc@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:26:08 -0400
From: Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
viremana@...ux.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: SVM: hyper-v: Remote TLB flush for SVM
On 4/16/2021 5:04 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Vineeth Pillai <viremana@...ux.microsoft.com> writes:
>
>
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
> +static void hv_init_vmcb(struct vmcb *vmcb)
> +{
> + struct hv_enlightenments *hve = &vmcb->hv_enlightenments;
> +
> + if (npt_enabled &&
> + ms_hyperv.nested_features & HV_X64_NESTED_ENLIGHTENED_TLB)
> Nitpick: we can probably have a 'static inline' for
>
> "npt_enabled && ms_hyperv.nested_features & HV_X64_NESTED_ENLIGHTENED_TLB"
>
> e.g. 'hv_svm_enlightened_tlbflush()'
Makes sense, will do.
Thanks,
Vineeth
Powered by blists - more mailing lists