[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ae35c14-f8aa-a181-2259-2d32bd2c1f07@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:21:48 -0700
From: "Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, cang@...eaurora.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
Yue Hu <huyue2@...ong.com>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/SAMSUNG S3C, S5P AND EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE HOST CONTROLLER DRIVER..."
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 1/2] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun
On 4/15/2021 4:11 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 4/14/21 11:58 AM, Asutosh Das wrote:
>> [ ... ]
>
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the comments. I will fix the comments in the next version.
> The following code is executed before ufshcd_async_scan() is called:
>
> dev = hba->dev;
> [ ... ]
> /* Hold auto suspend until async scan completes */
> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>
That would only keep the hba runtime resumed. At this point of time the
luns are not detected yet.
> and the following code occurs in ufshcd_add_lus():
>
> pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev);
>
> Isn't that sufficient to postpone enabling of runtime PM until LUN
> scanning has finished? Or in other words, is adding a
> pm_runtime_get_noresume() call in ufshcd_slave_configure() really necessary?
>
Yes, because the supplier (device wlun) may be suspended otherwise in
scsi_sysfs_add_sdev().
>> @@ -4979,15 +5035,9 @@ ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
>> */
>> if (!hba->pm_op_in_progress &&
>> !ufshcd_eh_in_progress(hba) &&
>> - ufshcd_is_exception_event(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr) &&
>> - schedule_work(&hba->eeh_work)) {
>> - /*
>> - * Prevent suspend once eeh_work is scheduled
>> - * to avoid deadlock between ufshcd_suspend
>> - * and exception event handler.
>> - */
>> - pm_runtime_get_noresume(hba->dev);
>> - }
>> + ufshcd_is_exception_event(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr))
>> + /* Flushed in suspend */
>> + schedule_work(&hba->eeh_work);
>
> What makes it safe to leave out the above pm_runtime_get_noresume() call?
>
The __ufshcd_wl_suspend() would flush this work so that it doesn't run
after suspend.
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists