linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Add shutdown() to vio_driver and vio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:46:50 -0700
From:   Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     mpe@...erman.id.au
Cc:     benh@...nel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Add shutdown() to vio_driver and vio_bus

On 4/1/21 5:13 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> Currently, neither the vio_bus or vio_driver structures provide support
> for a shutdown() routine.
> 
> Add support for shutdown() by allowing drivers to provide a
> implementation via function pointer in their vio_driver struct and
> provide a proper implementation in the driver template for the vio_bus
> that calls a vio drivers shutdown() if defined.
> 
> In the case that no shutdown() is defined by a vio driver and a kexec is
> in progress we implement a big hammer that calls remove() to ensure no
> further DMA for the devices is possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---

Ping... any comments, problems with this approach?

-Tyrel