linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871rbauffb.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 16 Apr 2021 22:45:28 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
        sboyd@...nel.org, corbet@....net, Mark.Rutland@....com,
        maz@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com, neeraju@...eaurora.org,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected

On Tue, Apr 13 2021 at 21:35, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>  #define WATCHDOG_INTERVAL (HZ >> 1)
>  #define WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD (NSEC_PER_SEC >> 4)

Didn't we discuss that the threshold is too big ?