| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:55:56 -0700
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>, corbet@....net,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
oneukum@...e.com, anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
almasrymina@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org,
osalvador@...e.de, mhocko@...e.com, song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com,
david@...hat.com, naoya.horiguchi@....com,
joao.m.martins@...cle.com
Cc: duanxiongchun@...edance.com, fam.zheng@...edance.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 5/9] mm: hugetlb: defer freeing of HugeTLB pages
On 4/15/21 1:40 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
> In the subsequent patch, we should allocate the vmemmap pages when
> freeing a HugeTLB page. But update_and_free_page() can be called
> under any context, so we cannot use GFP_KERNEL to allocate vmemmap
> pages. However, we can defer the actual freeing in a kworker to
> prevent from using GFP_ATOMIC to allocate the vmemmap pages.
Thanks! I knew we would need to introduce a kworker for this when I
removed the kworker previously used in free_huge_page.
> The __update_and_free_page() is where the call to allocate vmemmmap
> pages will be inserted.
This patch adds the functionality required for __update_and_free_page
to potentially sleep and fail. More questions will come up in the
subsequent patch when code must deal with the failures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c | 12 ---------
> mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h | 17 ++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 923d05e2806b..eeb8f5480170 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ static void remove_hugetlb_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page,
> h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
> }
>
> -static void update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> +static void __update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> {
> int i;
> struct page *subpage = page;
> @@ -1399,12 +1399,73 @@ static void update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * As update_and_free_page() can be called under any context, so we cannot
> + * use GFP_KERNEL to allocate vmemmap pages. However, we can defer the
> + * actual freeing in a workqueue to prevent from using GFP_ATOMIC to allocate
> + * the vmemmap pages.
> + *
> + * free_hpage_workfn() locklessly retrieves the linked list of pages to be
> + * freed and frees them one-by-one. As the page->mapping pointer is going
> + * to be cleared in free_hpage_workfn() anyway, it is reused as the llist_node
> + * structure of a lockless linked list of huge pages to be freed.
> + */
> +static LLIST_HEAD(hpage_freelist);
> +
> +static void free_hpage_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct llist_node *node;
> +
> + node = llist_del_all(&hpage_freelist);
> +
> + while (node) {
> + struct page *page;
> + struct hstate *h;
> +
> + page = container_of((struct address_space **)node,
> + struct page, mapping);
> + node = node->next;
> + page->mapping = NULL;
> + h = page_hstate(page);
The VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHuge(page), page) in page_hstate is going to
trigger because a previous call to remove_hugetlb_page() will
set_compound_page_dtor(page, NULL_COMPOUND_DTOR)
Note how h(hstate) is grabbed before calling update_and_free_page in
existing code.
We could potentially drop the !PageHuge(page) in page_hstate. Or,
perhaps just use 'size_to_hstate(page_size(page))' in free_hpage_workfn.
--
Mike Kravetz
> +
> + __update_and_free_page(h, page);
> +
> + cond_resched();
> + }
> +}
> +static DECLARE_WORK(free_hpage_work, free_hpage_workfn);
> +
> +static inline void flush_free_hpage_work(struct hstate *h)
> +{
> + if (free_vmemmap_pages_per_hpage(h))
> + flush_work(&free_hpage_work);
> +}
> +
> +static void update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page,
> + bool atomic)
> +{
> + if (!free_vmemmap_pages_per_hpage(h) || !atomic) {
> + __update_and_free_page(h, page);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Defer freeing to avoid using GFP_ATOMIC to allocate vmemmap pages.
> + *
> + * Only call schedule_work() if hpage_freelist is previously
> + * empty. Otherwise, schedule_work() had been called but the workfn
> + * hasn't retrieved the list yet.
> + */
> + if (llist_add((struct llist_node *)&page->mapping, &hpage_freelist))
> + schedule_work(&free_hpage_work);
> +}
> +
> static void update_and_free_pages_bulk(struct hstate *h, struct list_head *list)
> {
> struct page *page, *t_page;
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(page, t_page, list, lru) {
> - update_and_free_page(h, page);
> + update_and_free_page(h, page, false);
> cond_resched();
> }
> }
> @@ -1471,12 +1532,12 @@ void free_huge_page(struct page *page)
> if (HPageTemporary(page)) {
> remove_hugetlb_page(h, page, false);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hugetlb_lock, flags);
> - update_and_free_page(h, page);
> + update_and_free_page(h, page, true);
> } else if (h->surplus_huge_pages_node[nid]) {
> /* remove the page from active list */
> remove_hugetlb_page(h, page, true);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hugetlb_lock, flags);
> - update_and_free_page(h, page);
> + update_and_free_page(h, page, true);
> } else {
> arch_clear_hugepage_flags(page);
> enqueue_huge_page(h, page);
> @@ -1785,7 +1846,7 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)
> remove_hugetlb_page(h, page, false);
> h->max_huge_pages--;
> spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> - update_and_free_page(h, head);
> + update_and_free_page(h, head, false);
> return 0;
> }
> out:
> @@ -2627,6 +2688,7 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int nid,
> * pages in hstate via the proc/sysfs interfaces.
> */
> mutex_lock(&h->resize_lock);
> + flush_free_hpage_work(h);
> spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>
> /*
> @@ -2736,6 +2798,7 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int nid,
> /* free the pages after dropping lock */
> spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> update_and_free_pages_bulk(h, &page_list);
> + flush_free_hpage_work(h);
> spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>
> while (count < persistent_huge_pages(h)) {
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> index e45a138a7f85..cb28c5b6c9ff 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> @@ -180,18 +180,6 @@
> #define RESERVE_VMEMMAP_NR 2U
> #define RESERVE_VMEMMAP_SIZE (RESERVE_VMEMMAP_NR << PAGE_SHIFT)
>
> -/*
> - * How many vmemmap pages associated with a HugeTLB page that can be freed
> - * to the buddy allocator.
> - *
> - * Todo: Returns zero for now, which means the feature is disabled. We will
> - * enable it once all the infrastructure is there.
> - */
> -static inline unsigned int free_vmemmap_pages_per_hpage(struct hstate *h)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static inline unsigned long free_vmemmap_pages_size_per_hpage(struct hstate *h)
> {
> return (unsigned long)free_vmemmap_pages_per_hpage(h) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h
> index 6923f03534d5..01f8637adbe0 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.h
> @@ -12,9 +12,26 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP
> void free_huge_page_vmemmap(struct hstate *h, struct page *head);
> +
> +/*
> + * How many vmemmap pages associated with a HugeTLB page that can be freed
> + * to the buddy allocator.
> + *
> + * Todo: Returns zero for now, which means the feature is disabled. We will
> + * enable it once all the infrastructure is there.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned int free_vmemmap_pages_per_hpage(struct hstate *h)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> #else
> static inline void free_huge_page_vmemmap(struct hstate *h, struct page *head)
> {
> }
> +
> +static inline unsigned int free_vmemmap_pages_per_hpage(struct hstate *h)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP */
> #endif /* _LINUX_HUGETLB_VMEMMAP_H */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists