[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wnt2lglo.mognet@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 10:32:35 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: Ruifeng Zhang <ruifeng.zhang0110@...il.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, sudeep.holla@....com,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
mingo@...nel.org, ruifeng.zhang1@...soc.com, nianfu.bai@...soc.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] arm: topology: parse the topology from the dt
On 16/04/21 15:47, Ruifeng Zhang wrote:
> For more requirements, if all cores in one physical cluster, the
> {aff2} of all cores are the same value.
> i.e. the sc9863a,
> core0: 0000000081000000
> core1: 0000000081000100
> core2: 0000000081000200
> core3: 0000000081000300
> core4: 0000000081000400
> core5: 0000000081000500
> core6: 0000000081000600
> core7: 0000000081000700
>
> According to MPIDR all cores will parse to the one cluster, but it's
> the big.LITTLE system, it's need two logic cluster for schedule or
> cpufreq.
> So I think it's better to add the logic of parse topology from DT.
Ah, so it's a slightly different issue, but still one that requires a
different means of specifying topology.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists