[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210416094324.GA1962@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:43:25 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: He Zhe <zhe.he@...driver.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, paul@...l-moore.com,
eparis@...hat.com, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: syscall.h: Add sign extension handling in
syscall_get_return_value for compat
On 04/16, He Zhe wrote:
>
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,12 @@ static inline long syscall_get_error(struct task_struct *task,
> static inline long syscall_get_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
> struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - return regs->regs[0];
> + long val = regs->regs[0];
> +
> + if (is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(task)))
> + val = sign_extend64(val, 31);
> +
> + return val;
> }
I can't really review these arm-specific patches, but with this change both
syscall_get_error() and is_syscall_success() can use syscall_get_return_value()
to avoid the code duplication.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists