[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABTNMG3aweq43eQcONif2_M4JF3ARmBgOKE18v7vzHvaJnjrtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 09:24:30 +0800
From: Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@...onical.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, m.v.b@...box.com,
hadess@...ess.net, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] USB: Don't set USB_PORT_FEAT_SUSPEND on WD19's Realtek Hub
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 2:46 AM Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:13:43AM +0800, Chris Chiu wrote:
> > One thing worth mentioning here, I never hit the hub_ext_port_status -71
> > problem if I resume by waking up from the keyboard connected to the hub.
>
> I thought you said earlier that the port got into trouble while it was
> suspending, not while it was resuming. You wrote:
>
> > [ 2789.679812] usb 3-4-port3: can't suspend, status -110
>
> So if the problem occurs during suspend, how can it be possible to avoid
> the problem by taking some particular action later while resuming?
>
The ETIMEDOUT is still there, but the port can resume w/o problems and I
don't really know what the hub did. I can only reset_resume the hub to bring it
back if I'm not waking up from the connected keyboard.
> > But the usbcore kernel log shows me wPortStatus: 0503 wPortChane: 0004
> > of that port while resuming. In normal cases, they are 0507:0000.
>
> The 0004 bit of wPortChange means that the suspend status has changed;
> the port is no longer suspended because the device attached to that port
> (your keyboard) issued a wakeup request.
>
> > I don't know how to SetPortFeature() with setting the status change bit only.
>
> You can't. Only the hub itself can set the wPortChange bits.
>
> > Or maybe it's just some kind of timing issue of the
> > idle/suspend/resume signaling.
>
> Not timing. It's because you woke the system up from the attached
> keyboard.
>
> Alan Stern
Got it. I'm just confused by the USB 2.0 spec 11.24.2.7.2 that
"Hubs may allow setting of the status change bits with a SetPortFeature()
request for diagnostic purposes."
So for this case, I think USB_QUIRK_RESET_RESUME would be a
better option to at least bring back the port. Any suggestion about what
kind of test I can do on this hub? Thanks
Chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists