[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1541221b-3dd3-9cc6-1dfe-6a4a100579d0@vaisala.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 15:21:14 +0300
From: Tomas Melin <tomas.melin@...sala.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aardelean@...iqon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: accel: Add driver for Murata SCA3300
accelerometer
Updated email-address for Alexandru.
On 4/16/21 3:17 PM, Tomas Melin wrote:
> On 4/15/21 11:41 AM, Tomas Melin wrote:
>
>>
>> While working on updates I did notice something new which I cannot
>>
>> reproduce on older (5.10.17 kernel) version. If compiling this as a
>> module, getting error while
>>
>> unloading module:
>>
>> [ 40.200084] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
>> virtual address 00000104
>> ...
>>
>> [ 40.510054] Backtrace:
>> [ 40.512502] [<c06c5e0c>] (iio_device_ioctl_handler_unregister)
>> from [<c06ca8c4>] (iio_buffers_free_sysfs_and_mask+0x2c/0x6c)
>> [ 40.523735] [<c06ca898>] (iio_buffers_free_sysfs_and_mask) from
>> [<c06c4a18>] (iio_device_unregister+0xa8/0xac)
>> [ 40.533746] r5:c1811228 r4:c1811000
>> [ 40.537318] [<c06c4970>] (iio_device_unregister) from [<c06c4a38>]
>> (devm_iio_device_unreg+0x1c/0x20)
>> [ 40.546461] r5:c2415000 r4:c25bab80
>> [ 40.550025] [<c06c4a1c>] (devm_iio_device_unreg) from [<c0556820>]
>> (release_nodes+0x1c0/0x1f0)
>> [ 40.558654] [<c0556660>] (release_nodes) from [<c0556bb0>]
>> (devres_release_all+0x40/0x60)
>> [ 40.566847] r10:00000081 r9:c2350000 r8:c0100264 r7:00000081
>> r6:bf00c010 r5:c19be000
>> [ 40.574669] r4:c1a91c00
>> [ 40.577194] [<c0556b70>] (devres_release_all) from [<c055216c>]
>> (device_release_driver_internal+0x120/0x1cc)
>> [ 40.587031] r5:c19be000 r4:c1a91c00
>> [ 40.590596] [<c055204c>] (device_release_driver_internal) from
>> [<c05522b4>] (driver_detach+0x54/0x90)
>> [ 40.599828] r7:00000081 r6:00000000 r5:bf00c010 r4:c1a91c00
>> [ 40.605482] [<c0552260>] (driver_detach) from [<c0550ba4>]
>> (bus_remove_driver+0x5c/0xb0)
>> [ 40.613583] r5:00000800 r4:bf00c010
>> [ 40.617148] [<c0550b48>] (bus_remove_driver) from [<c0552c38>]
>> (driver_unregister+0x38/0x5c)
>> [ 40.625596] r5:00000800 r4:bf00c010
>> [ 40.629161] [<c0552c00>] (driver_unregister) from [<bf00a760>]
>> (sca3300_driver_exit+0x14/0x8b4 [sca3300])
>> [ 40.638747] r5:00000800 r4:bf00c080
>> [ 40.642311] [<bf00a74c>] (sca3300_driver_exit [sca3300]) from
>> [<c01c06f0>] (sys_delete_module+0x16c/0x238)
>> [ 40.651990] [<c01c0584>] (sys_delete_module) from [<c0100244>]
>> (__sys_trace_return+0x0/0x1c)
>> [ 40.660435] Exception stack(0xc2351fa8 to 0xc2351ff0)
>> [ 40.665484] 1fa0: 0050e5a8 00000000 0050e5e4
>> 00000800 081d4b00 bec18af4
>> [ 40.673661] 1fc0: 0050e5a8 00000000 bec18b50 00000081 bec18e51
>> 0050e190 00000001 bec18d3c
>> [ 40.681834] 1fe0: 0050cf70 bec18afc 004f1ec8 b6ecb27c
>> [ 40.686887] r6:bec18b50 r5:00000000 r4:0050e5a8
>> [ 40.691507] Code: e8bd4000 e1c020d0 e3a0cc01 e3001122 (e5823004)
>> [ 40.707675] ---[ end trace 189882b050077333 ]---
>>
>> This happens when building against linux-next
>> 5.12.0-rc6-next-20210409. I'm failing to see what is wrong. Any ideas?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tomas
>
>
> Tested further that for this driver, loading and unloading as module
> works fine until commit:
>
> commit f73f7f4da581875f9b1f2fb8ebd1ab15ed634488
> Author: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
> Date: Mon Feb 15 12:40:39 2021 +0200
>
> iio: buffer: add ioctl() to support opening extra buffers for IIO
> device
>
>
> Any thoughts what causes this issue?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tomas
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iio/accel/Kconfig | 13 ++
>>>> drivers/iio/accel/Makefile | 1 +
>>>> drivers/iio/accel/sca3300.c | 434
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 448 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/iio/accel/sca3300.c
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/accel/Kconfig
>>>> index cceda3cecbcf..0dbf7b648e8a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -450,6 +450,19 @@ config SCA3000
>>>> To compile this driver as a module, say M here: the module
>>>> will be
>>>> called sca3000.
>>>> +config SCA3300
>>>> + tristate "Murata SCA3300 3-Axis Accelerometer Driver"
>>>> + depends on SPI
>>>> + select CRC8
>>>> + select IIO_BUFFER
>>>> + select IIO_TRIGGERED_BUFFER
>>>> + help
>>>> + Say yes here to build support for Murata SCA3300 3-Axis
>>>> + accelerometer.
>>>> +
>>>> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
>>>> module will be
>>>> + called sca3300.
>>>> +
>>>> config STK8312
>>>> tristate "Sensortek STK8312 3-Axis Accelerometer Driver"
>>>> depends on I2C
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/Makefile b/drivers/iio/accel/Makefile
>>>> index 32cd1342a31a..4b56527a2b97 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/Makefile
>>>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MXC4005) += mxc4005.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MXC6255) += mxc6255.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_SCA3000) += sca3000.o
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SCA3300) += sca3300.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_STK8312) += stk8312.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_STK8BA50) += stk8ba50.o
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3300.c b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3300.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..112fb88ecd3a
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3300.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,434 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright (c) Vaisala Oyj. All rights reserved.
>>> Give a year for the copyright notice if you can.
>>>
>>>> + */
>>>> +#include <linux/crc8.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/iio/buffer.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/iio/trigger_consumer.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/iio/triggered_buffer.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#define SCA3300_ALIAS "sca3300"
>>>> +
>>>> +#define SCA3300_REG_STATUS 0x6
>>>> +#define SCA3300_REG_MODE 0xd
>>>> +#define SCA3300_REG_WHOAMI 0x10
>>>> +#define SCA3300_VALUE_SW_RESET 0x20
>>>> +#define SCA3300_CRC8_POLYNOMIAL 0x1d
>>>> +#define SCA3300_X_READ 0
>>> I wouldn't bother defining this.
>>>
>>>> +#define SCA3300_X_WRITE BIT(7)
>>> Even this one is something I'd just put inline with a comment.
>>>
>>>> +#define SCA3300_DEVICE_ID 0x51
>>>> +#define SCA3300_RS_ERROR 0x3
>>>> +
>>>> +enum sca3300_scan_indexes {
>>>> + SCA3300_ACC_X = 0,
>>>> + SCA3300_ACC_Y,
>>>> + SCA3300_ACC_Z,
>>>> + SCA3300_TEMP,
>>>> + SCA3300_TIMESTAMP,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +#define SCA3300_ACCEL_CHANNEL(index, reg, axis) { \
>>>> + .type = IIO_ACCEL, \
>>>> + .address = reg, \
>>>> + .modified = 1, \
>>>> + .channel2 = IIO_MOD_##axis, \
>>>> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | \
>>>> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED), \
>>> As mentioned below, don't provide PROCESSED. Userspace is better at
>>> handling the
>>> conversion so leave it to them.
>>>
>>>> + .info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE), \
>>>> + .scan_index = index, \
>>>> + .scan_type = { \
>>>> + .sign = 's', \
>>>> + .realbits = 16, \
>>>> + .storagebits = 16, \
>>>> + .shift = 0, \
>>>> + .endianness = IIO_CPU, \
>>>> + }, \
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct iio_chan_spec sca3300_channels[] = {
>>>> + SCA3300_ACCEL_CHANNEL(SCA3300_ACC_X, 0x1, X),
>>>> + SCA3300_ACCEL_CHANNEL(SCA3300_ACC_Y, 0x2, Y),
>>>> + SCA3300_ACCEL_CHANNEL(SCA3300_ACC_Z, 0x3, Z),
>>>> + {
>>>> + .type = IIO_TEMP,
>>>> + .address = 0x5,
>>>> + .scan_index = SCA3300_TEMP,
>>>> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
>>>> + .scan_type = {
>>>> + .sign = 's',
>>>> + .realbits = 16,
>>>> + .storagebits = 16,
>>>> + .shift = 0,
>>>> + .endianness = IIO_CPU,
>>>> + },
>>>> + },
>>>> + IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(4),
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const int sca3300_accel_scale[] = {2700, 1350, 5400, 5400};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const unsigned long sca3300_scan_masks[] = {
>>>> + BIT(SCA3300_ACC_X) | BIT(SCA3300_ACC_Y) | BIT(SCA3300_ACC_Z) |
>>>> + BIT(SCA3300_TEMP),
>>>> + 0};
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * SCA3300 device data
>>> run scripts/kernel-doc over the file and fix the warnings + errors.
>>>
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @spi SPI device structure
>>>> + * @opmode Device operation mode
>>>> + * @lock Data buffer lock
>>>> + * @txbuf Transmit buffer
>>>> + * @rxbuf Receive buffer
>>>> + * @scan Triggered buffer. Four channel 16-bit data + 64-bit
>>>> timestamp
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct sca3300_data {
>>>> + struct spi_device *spi;
>>>> + u32 opmode;
>>>> + struct mutex lock;
>>>> + u8 txbuf[4];
>>>> + u8 rxbuf[4];
>>>> + struct {
>>>> + s16 channels[4];
>>>> + s64 ts __aligned(sizeof(s64));
>>>> + } scan;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +DECLARE_CRC8_TABLE(sca3300_crc_table);
>>>> +
>>>> +static int sca3300_transfer(struct sca3300_data *sca_data, int *val)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct spi_delay delay = {.value = 10, .unit =
>>>> SPI_DELAY_UNIT_USECS};
>>>> + int32_t ret;
>>>> + int rs;
>>>> + u8 crc;
>>>> + struct spi_transfer xfers[2] = {
>>>> + {
>>>> + .tx_buf = sca_data->txbuf,
>>>> + .rx_buf = NULL,
>>>> + .len = ARRAY_SIZE(sca_data->txbuf),
>>>> + .delay = delay,
>>>> + .cs_change = 1,
>>>> + },
>>>> + {
>>>> + .tx_buf = NULL,
>>>> + .rx_buf = sca_data->rxbuf,
>>>> + .len = ARRAY_SIZE(sca_data->rxbuf),
>>>> + .delay = delay,
>>>> + .cs_change = 0,
>>>> + }
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + /* inverted crc value as described in device data sheet */
>>>> + crc = ~crc8(sca3300_crc_table, &sca_data->txbuf[0], 3,
>>>> CRC8_INIT_VALUE);
>>>> + sca_data->txbuf[3] = crc;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = spi_sync_transfer(sca_data->spi, xfers, 2);
>>> Use ARRAY_SIZE(xfers) instead of 2.
>>>
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(&sca_data->spi->dev,
>>>> + "transfer error, error: %d\n", ret);
>>>> + return -EIO;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + crc = ~crc8(sca3300_crc_table, &sca_data->rxbuf[0], 3,
>>>> CRC8_INIT_VALUE);
>>>> + if (sca_data->rxbuf[3] != crc) {
>>>> + dev_err(&sca_data->spi->dev, "CRC checksum mismatch");
>>>> + return -EIO;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /* get return status */
>>>> + rs = sca_data->rxbuf[0] & 0x03;
>>>> + if (rs == SCA3300_RS_ERROR)
>>>> + return rs;
>>>> +
>>>> + *val = (s16)(sca_data->rxbuf[2] | (sca_data->rxbuf[1] << 8));
>>> Preference for an unaligned endian conversion here and explicit sign
>>> extend e.g
>>> something like
>>>
>>> sign_extend32(get_unaligned_le16(&sca_data->rxbuf[1]), 15)
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int sca3300_read_reg(struct sca3300_data *sca_data, u8 reg,
>>>> int *val)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_lock(&sca_data->lock);
>>>> + sca_data->txbuf[0] = SCA3300_X_READ | (reg << 2);
>>>> + ret = sca3300_transfer(sca_data, val);
>>>> + if (ret > 0) {
>>>> + sca_data->txbuf[0] = SCA3300_X_READ | (SCA3300_REG_STATUS
>>>> << 2);
>>>> + ret = sca3300_transfer(sca_data, val);
>>>> + /* status 0 = startup, 0x2 = mode change */
>>>> + if (ret > 0 && *val != 0 && *val != 0x2) {
>>>> + dev_err_ratelimited(&sca_data->spi->dev,
>>>> + "device status: %x\n",
>>>> + (u16)*val);
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&sca_data->lock);
>>>> + return -EIO;
>>>> + }
>>>> + if (ret > 0)
>>>> + ret = 0;
>>>> + }
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&sca_data->lock);
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int sca3300_write_reg(struct sca3300_data *sca_data, u8
>>>> reg, int val)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int reg_val = 0;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_lock(&sca_data->lock);
>>>> + sca_data->txbuf[0] = SCA3300_X_WRITE | (reg << 2);
>>>> + sca_data->txbuf[1] = val >> 8;
>>>> + sca_data->txbuf[2] = val & 0xFF;
>>> Prefer (Slightly) an unaligned put.
>>>
>>>> + ret = sca3300_transfer(sca_data, ®_val);
>>>> + if (ret > 0) {
>>> Factor this error handling out to another function, plus trigger it
>>> from an
>>> appropriate standard error code rather than a positive return value.
>>>
>>>> + sca_data->txbuf[0] = SCA3300_X_READ | (SCA3300_REG_STATUS
>>>> << 2);
>>>> + ret = sca3300_transfer(sca_data, ®_val);
>>>> + /* status 0 = startup, 0x2 = mode change */
>>>> + if (ret > 0 && reg_val != 0 && reg_val != 0x2) {
>>>> + dev_err_ratelimited(&sca_data->spi->dev,
>>>> + "device status: %x\n",
>>>> + (u16)reg_val);
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&sca_data->lock);
>>>> + return -EIO;
>>>> + }
>>>> + if (ret > 0)
>>>> + ret = 0;
>>> Whenever you get this sort of juggling it rather implies your design is
>>> less than ideal.
>>>
>>>> + }
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&sca_data->lock);
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int sca3300_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>>>> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
>>>> + int val, int val2, long mask)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct sca3300_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>>> +
>>>> + switch (mask) {
>>>> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
>>>> + if (val < 0 || val > 3)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> No. Scale values need to be the value of 1LSB not a random integer
>>> that requires you to look up the datasheet.
>>>
>>>> + return sca3300_write_reg(data, SCA3300_REG_MODE, val);
>>>> + default:
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int sca3300_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>>>> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
>>>> + int *val, int *val2, long mask)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct sca3300_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> + int reg_val;
>>>> +
>>>> + switch (mask) {
>>>> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
>>>> + ret = sca3300_read_reg(data, chan->address, val);
>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
>>>> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
>>>> + ret = sca3300_read_reg(data, SCA3300_REG_MODE, ®_val);
>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + *val = sca3300_accel_scale[reg_val];
>>> Scale is very very rarely an integer value which makes me wonder what
>>> you are returning here... It should be the multiplier needed to
>>> take the raw value to a reading in m/sec^2 Given you use it as
>>> fractional
>>> below, I'm guessing this is 1/scale_value?
>>>
>>>> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
>>>> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED:
>>> Don't provide processed here. Userspace needs to do the conversion
>>> itself
>>> (and given it has floating point easily available will probably do a
>>> better
>>> job than we can). I'm assuming the mode can't autonomously change?
>>>
>>>> + ret = sca3300_read_reg(data, SCA3300_REG_MODE, ®_val);
>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + *val2 = sca3300_accel_scale[reg_val];
>>>> + ret = sca3300_read_reg(data, chan->address, val);
>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL;
>>>> + default:
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static irqreturn_t sca3300_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct iio_poll_func *pf = p;
>>>> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
>>>> + struct sca3300_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>>> + s64 time_ns = iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev);
>>> Is the timestamp at the start more accurate that that at the end
>>> of reading the channels? If not, just put this inline in the
>>> iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp() call.
>>>
>>>> + int bit, ret, val, i = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + for_each_set_bit(bit, indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
>>>> + indio_dev->masklength) {
>>>> + ret = sca3300_read_reg(data, sca3300_channels[bit].address,
>>>> + &val);
>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>> Given we can't return an error code from interrupt handlers, it is
>>> usually
>>> a good idea to print something to the log. Otherwise we get missing
>>> data
>>> with no idea of why..
>>>
>>>> + goto out;
>>>> + if (ARRAY_SIZE(data->scan.channels) > i)
>>> How could this not be true? If it's always true, don't bother
>>> checking i.
>>>
>>>> + ((s16 *)data->scan.channels)[i++] = val;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(indio_dev, &data->scan,
>>>> time_ns);
>>>> +out:
>>>> + iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
>>>> +
>>>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int sca3300_init(struct sca3300_data *sca_data,
>>>> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> + int value = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (sca_data->opmode < 1 || sca_data->opmode > 4)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> Whilst this is going anyway, better to check that next to where
>>> it is read so we drop out immediately rather than buried in this
>>> function.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = sca3300_write_reg(sca_data, SCA3300_REG_MODE,
>>>> + SCA3300_VALUE_SW_RESET);
>>>> + if (ret != 0)
>>>> + return ret;
>>> For sleeps, good to reference which section in data sheet gives the
>>> timing.
>>>
>>>> + usleep_range(2e3, 10e3);
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = sca3300_write_reg(sca_data, SCA3300_REG_MODE,
>>>> + sca_data->opmode - 1);
>>>> + if (ret != 0)
>>> if (ret) see below.
>>>
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + msleep(100);
>>> Again, document where the time comes from. Saves reviewers time if
>>> they want to check it. (I'm too lazy :)
>>>
>>>> + ret = sca3300_read_reg(sca_data, SCA3300_REG_WHOAMI, &value);
>>>> + if (ret != 0)
>>> if (ret) is more idiomatic in kernel code.
>>>
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (value != SCA3300_DEVICE_ID) {
>>>> + dev_err(&sca_data->spi->dev, "device id not expected
>>>> value\n");
>>> Perhaps useful to print what was expected and what was seen. Maybe it's
>>> a new variant and this might help the user to identify that and add
>>> it to the
>>> driver.
>>>
>>>> + return -EIO;
>>> -EINVAL probably more appropriate return.
>>>
>>>> + }
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int sca3300_debugfs_reg_access(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>>>> + unsigned int reg, unsigned int writeval,
>>>> + unsigned int *readval)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct sca3300_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>>> + int value;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (reg > 0x1f)
>>> Use a define that names that register.
>>>
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!readval)
>>>> + return sca3300_write_reg(data, reg, writeval);
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = sca3300_read_reg(data, reg, &value);
>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + *readval = (unsigned int)value;
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct iio_info sca3300_info = {
>>>> + .read_raw = sca3300_read_raw,
>>>> + .write_raw = sca3300_write_raw,
>>>> + .debugfs_reg_access = &sca3300_debugfs_reg_access,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static int sca3300_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct sca3300_data *sca_data;
>>>> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*sca_data));
>>>> + if (!indio_dev) {
>>>> + dev_err(&spi->dev,
>>>> + "failed to allocate memory for iio device\n");
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + sca_data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>>> + mutex_init(&sca_data->lock);
>>>> + sca_data->spi = spi;
>>>> + spi_set_drvdata(spi, indio_dev);
>>> Won't be used once using devm as below and remove() is dropped, so
>>> drop this.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + crc8_populate_msb(sca3300_crc_table, SCA3300_CRC8_POLYNOMIAL);
>>>> +
>>>> + indio_dev->dev.parent = &spi->dev;
>>>> + indio_dev->info = &sca3300_info;
>>>> + indio_dev->name = SCA3300_ALIAS;
>>>> + indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE | INDIO_BUFFER_TRIGGERED;
>>> BUFFER_TRIGGERED bit now set by iio_triggered_buffer_setup() so
>>> shouldn't
>>> be ehre as well.
>>>
>>>> + indio_dev->channels = sca3300_channels;
>>>> + indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(sca3300_channels);
>>>> + indio_dev->available_scan_masks = sca3300_scan_masks;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (spi->dev.of_node) {
>>>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(spi->dev.of_node, "murata,opmode",
>>> Please use generic firmware access calls rather than the of specific
>>> ones.
>>> That lets us get ACPI support for free :)
>>>
>>> As per the binding review however, this one needs to go in favour of
>>> userspace
>>> control of scale + filter frequencies / sampling freq.
>>>
>>>> + &sca_data->opmode);
>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = sca3300_init(sca_data, indio_dev);
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "failed to init device, error: %d\n",
>>>> ret);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = iio_triggered_buffer_setup(indio_dev,
>>>> iio_pollfunc_store_time,
>>>> + sca3300_trigger_handler, NULL);
>>> devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup() and you can drop the manual
>>> cleanup in remove()
>>> and hence drop remove() entirely as nothing else left.
>>>
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(&spi->dev,
>>>> + "iio triggered buffer setup failed, error: %d\n", ret);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = devm_iio_device_register(&spi->dev, indio_dev);
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "iio device register failed, error: %d\n",
>>>> + ret);
>>>> + iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev);
>>> With devm above, no need to manually clean this up.
>>>
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int sca3300_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
>>>> +
>>>> + iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev);
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct of_device_id sca3300_dt_ids[] = {
>>>> + { .compatible = "murata,sca3300"},
>>>> + {},
>>>> +};
>>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sca3300_dt_ids);
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct spi_driver sca3300_driver = {
>>>> + .driver = {
>>>> + .name = SCA3300_ALIAS,
>>>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(sca3300_dt_ids),
>>>> + },
>>>> +
>>>> + .probe = sca3300_probe,
>>>> + .remove = sca3300_remove,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +module_spi_driver(sca3300_driver);
>>>> +
>>>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Tomas Melin <tomas.melin@...sala.com>");
>>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Murata SCA3300 SPI Accelerometer");
>>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists