[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03f4152a-e66e-6b4a-5b4a-5f79f9ce2302@windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 22:04:30 +0800
From: "quanyang.wang" <quanyang.wang@...driver.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@...inx.com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: fix clk_enable/disable
imbalance issue
Hi Mark,
On 4/16/21 8:55 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 08:46:48AM +0800, quanyang.wang@...driver.com wrote:
>
>> Since pm_runtime works now, clks can be enabled/disabled by calling
>> zynqmp_runtime_suspend/resume. So we don't need to enable these clks
>> explicitly in zynqmp_qspi_setup_op. Remove them to fix this issue.
>> Fixes: 1c26372e5aa9 ("spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: Update driver to use spi-mem framework")
> Are you *sure* this fixes is accurate? The patch (and several of the
> others that flag the same commit) doesn't apply against for-5.12, though
> at this point there's not really enough time to send another pull request
> so it doesn't super matter though someone will probably need to help out
> with stable backports.
I am sorry. These patches should NOT be with "Fixes" tag since they base
on the patches
which are not with "Fixes". May I send a V2 patch series which remove
these "Fixes" tags?
Thanks,
Quanyang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists