[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHmwoe8+mNPBFm1R@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:43:29 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] [RFC] Rust support
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 05:04:41PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Of course, we could propose something similar for C -- in fact, there
> was a recent discussion around this in the C committee triggered by my
> n2659 "Safety attributes for C" paper.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2659.htm
That's just not making any damn sense what so ever. That seems to be
about sprinkling abort() all over the place, which is just total
rubbish.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists