linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 02/28] mm: Introduce struct folio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:55:16 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/28] mm: Introduce struct folio

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 07:50:39PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> A struct folio is a new abstraction to replace the venerable struct page.
> A function which takes a struct folio argument declares that it will
> operate on the entire (possibly compound) page, not just PAGE_SIZE bytes.
> In return, the caller guarantees that the pointer it is passing does
> not point to a tail page.
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
[...]
> +static inline struct folio *page_folio(struct page *page)
> +{
> +	unsigned long head = READ_ONCE(page->compound_head);
> +
> +	if (unlikely(head & 1))
> +		return (struct folio *)(head - 1);
> +	return (struct folio *)page;
> +}

I'm looking at changing this for the next revision, and basing it on
my recent patch to make compound_head() const-preserving:

+#define page_folio(page)       _Generic((page),                        \
+       const struct page *:    (const struct folio *)_compound_head(page), \
+       struct page *:          (struct folio *)_compound_head(page))

I've also noticed an awkward pattern occurring that I think this makes
less awkward:

+/**
+ * folio_page - Return a page from a folio.
+ * @folio: The folio.
+ * @n: The page number to return.
+ *
+ * @n is relative to the start of the folio.  It should be between
+ * 0 and folio_nr_pages(@folio) - 1, but this is not checked for.
+ */
+#define folio_page(folio, n)   nth_page(&(folio)->page, n)

That lets me simplify folio_next():

+static inline struct folio *folio_next(struct folio *folio)
+{
+       return (struct folio *)folio_page(folio, folio_nr_pages(folio));
+}

(it occurs to me this should also be const-preserving, but it's not clear
that's needed yet)