[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcdXg+Z0Xz7X_cZSdbockvMO6YjdqxcWp9-_P85SPFKZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:06:16 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc: Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@...inx.com>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhraj@...inx.com>,
Srinivas Goud <sgoud@...inx.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
git <git@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpio: zynq: use module_platform_driver to simplify
the code
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 9:28 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@...libre.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 4:45 PM Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@...inx.com> wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 4:14 PM
> > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:08 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
...
> > > Yep, this has been like this since the initial introduction of this driver.
> > > Unfortunately there's no documented reason so unless we can test it, it has
> > > to stay this way.
> > >
> > I tested driver, functionality wise everything working fine.
> > Based on below conversation, I moved driver to module driver.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/818202/
> >
>
> Andy: How about we give it a try then? If anyone yells, we'll just revert it.
Sounds like a plan!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists