[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHsPiNAjr919VGIe@workstation.tuxnet>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 18:40:40 +0200
From: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] pwm: pca9685: Switch to atomic API
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 05:37:28PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:27:38PM +0200, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > The switch to the atomic API goes hand in hand with a few fixes to
> > previously experienced issues:
> > - The duty cycle is no longer lost after disable/enable (previously the
> > OFF registers were cleared in disable and the user was required to
> > call config to restore the duty cycle settings)
> > - If one sets a period resulting in the same prescale register value,
> > the sleep and write to the register is now skipped
> > - Previously, only the full ON bit was toggled in GPIO mode (and full
> > OFF cleared if set to high), which could result in both full OFF and
> > full ON not being set and on=0, off=0, which is not allowed according
> > to the datasheet
> > - The OFF registers were reset to 0 in probe, which could lead to the
> > forbidden on=0, off=0. Fixed by resetting to POR default (full OFF)
>
> I didn't recheck all details, but the patch is definitively an
> improvement, so:
>
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Thanks, but there is a newer version v9, I assume your acks are meant
for the newer one?
Clemens
Powered by blists - more mailing lists