[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YHtGhqBXhWlUHHRm@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:35:18 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/uaccess: small optimization in unsafe_copy_to_user()
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 08:30:42PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> and that thing is still there. However, it does *NOT* do what it might
> appear to be doing; it ends up with getdents() returning -EINVAL instead.
> What we need is
> buf->error = -EINTR;
> in addition to that return (in all 3 such places). Do you have any problems with
> the following delta?
No, wait - we have non-NULL buf->prev_reclen, so we'll hit
if (buf.prev_reclen) {
struct compat_linux_dirent __user * lastdirent;
lastdirent = (void __user *)buf.current_dir - buf.prev_reclen;
if (put_user(buf.ctx.pos, &lastdirent->d_off))
error = -EFAULT;
else
error = count - buf.count;
}
with buf->error completely ignored. Nevermind.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists