linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAjnzAn9vrQHzVzOX9_VbBHznyanpbmc5uHCDCDVa+Vib7708A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Apr 2021 12:16:19 -0700
From:   Patrick Mccormick <pmccormick@...italocean.com>
To:     Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/103] 5.10.32-rc1 review

We ran tests on this kernel:

commit 32f5704a0a4f7dcc8aa74a49dbcce359d758f6d5 (HEAD -> rc/linux-5.10.y)
Author: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu Apr 15 16:44:09 2021 +0200

    Linux 5.10.31-rc1

No problems found.

Hardware tested on:

model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz

Specific tests ran:

ok 1 ltp.py:LTP.test_nptl
ok 2 ltp.py:LTP.test_math
ok 3 ltp.py:LTP.test_dio
ok 4 ltp.py:LTP.test_io
ok 5 ltp.py:LTP.test_power_management_tests
ok 6 ltp.py:LTP.test_can
ok 7 ltp.py:LTP.test_input
ok 8 ltp.py:LTP.test_hugetlb
ok 9 ltp.py:LTP.test_ipc
ok 10 ltp.py:LTP.test_uevent
ok 11 ltp.py:LTP.test_smoketest
ok 12 ltp.py:LTP.test_containers
ok 13 ltp.py:LTP.test_filecaps
ok 14 ltp.py:LTP.test_sched
ok 15 ltp.py:LTP.test_hyperthreading
ok 16 ltp.py:LTP.test_cap_bounds
ok 17 kpatch.sh
ok 18 perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_help
ok 19 perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_version
ok 20 perf.py:PerfNonPriv.test_perf_list
ok 21 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_record
ok 22 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_kallsyms
ok 23 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_annotate
ok 24 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_evlist
ok 25 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_cmd_script
ok 26 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_stat
ok 27 perf.py:PerfPriv.test_perf_bench
ok 28 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sysctl
ok 29 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_size
ok 30 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sync
ok 31 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_capabilities
ok 32 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_x86
ok 33 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_pidfd
ok 34 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_membarrier
ok 35 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sigaltstack
ok 36 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_tmpfs
ok 37 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_user
ok 38 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_sched
ok 39 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timens
ok 40 kselftest.py:kselftest.test_timers

Tested-By: Patrick McCormick <pmccormick@...italocean.com>

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:27 AM Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:05:11 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.32 release.
> > There are 103 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:05:09 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >       https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.32-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
>
> 5.10.32-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
>
> Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>
>