lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210419050926.GB405651@elm>
Date:   Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:09:26 -0500
From:   Tyler Hicks <code@...icks.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Bob Peterson <rpeterso@...hat.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        cluster-devel@...hat.com, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        James Morris <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        "Michael A. Halcrow" <mahalcro@...ibm.com>,
        "Michael A. Halcrow" <mhalcrow@...ibm.com>,
        "Michael C. Thompsion" <mcthomps@...ibm.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        "Trevor S. Highland" <trevor.highland@...il.com>,
        Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] Rid W=1 warnings from GFS2 and EncryptFS

On 2021-03-30 17:44:27, Lee Jones wrote:
> This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> niggly little warnings.
> 
> There is more to do in filesystems.  Another set will follow.
> 
> Lee Jones (31):
...
>   fs: ecryptfs: read_write: File headers do not make good candidates for
>     kernel-doc
>   fs: ecryptfs: debug: Demote a couple of kernel-doc abuses
>   fs: ecryptfs: dentry: File headers are not good candidates for
>     kernel-doc
>   fs: ecryptfs: kthread: Demote file header and provide description for
>     'cred'
>   fs: ecryptfs: file: Demote kernel-doc abuses
>   fs: ecryptfs: super: Fix formatting, naming and kernel-doc abuses
>   fs: ecryptfs: messaging: Add missing param descriptions and demote
>     abuses
>   fs: ecryptfs: main: Demote a bunch of non-conformant kernel-doc
>     headers
>   fs: ecryptfs: miscdev: File headers are not good kernel-doc candidates
>   fs: ecryptfs: crypto: Supply some missing param descriptions and
>     demote abuses
>   fs: ecryptfs: mmap: Help out one function header and demote other
>     abuses
>   fs: ecryptfs: inode: Help out nearly-there header and demote
>     non-conformant ones
>   fs: ecryptfs: keystore: Fix some kernel-doc issues and demote
>     non-conformant headers

I've applied the eCryptfs fixes to the next branch of
tyhicks/ecryptfs.git. Thanks for the clean-up!

Tyler

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ