[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YH4VdPNO9cdzc5MD@atmark-techno.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:42:44 +0900
From: Dominique MARTINET <dominique.martinet@...ark-techno.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Alice Guo (OSS)" <alice.guo@....nxp.com>,
gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>,
Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>,
aymen.sghaier@....com, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
peter.ujfalusi@...il.com, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, tomba@...nel.org,
jyri.sarha@....fi, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kishon <kishon@...com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Roy Pledge <Roy.Pledge@....com>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson SoC support"
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..."
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 PATCH 3/3] driver: update all the code that use
soc_device_match
Arnd Bergmann wrote on Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 02:16:36PM +0200:
> In some cases, you can use the device_link infrastructure to deal
> with dependencies between devices. Not sure if this would help
> in your case, but have a look at device_link_add() etc in drivers/base/core.c
I'll need to actually try to convince myself but if creating the link
forces driver registration then it should be workable.
> > In this particular case the problem is that since 7d981405d0fd ("soc:
> > imx8m: change to use platform driver") the soc probe tries to use the
> > nvmem driver for ocotp fuses for imx8m devices, which isn't ready yet.
> > So soc loading gets pushed back to the end of the list because it gets
> > defered and other drivers relying on soc_device_match get confused
> > because they wrongly think a device doesn't match a quirk when it
> > actually does.
> >
> > If there is a way to ensure the nvmem driver gets loaded before the soc,
> > that would also solve the problem nicely, and avoid the need to mess
> > with all the ~50 drivers which use it.
> >
> > Is there a way to control in what order drivers get loaded? Something in
> > the dtb perhaps?
>
> For built-in drivers, load order depends on the initcall level and
> link order (how things are lined listed in the Makefile hierarchy).
>
> For loadable modules, this is up to user space in the end.
>
> Which of the drivers in this scenario are loadable modules?
All the drivers involved in my case are built-in (nvmem, soc and final
soc_device_match consumer e.g. caam_jr that crashes the kernel if soc is
not identified properly).
I frankly don't like the idea of moving nvmem/ above soc/ in
drivers/Makefile as a "solution" to this (especially as there is one
that seems to care about what soc they run on...), so I'll have a look
at links first, hopefully that will work out.
Thanks,
--
Dominique
Powered by blists - more mailing lists