linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] kunit: mptcp: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWfYHjNOmPSEbPOJeqniQoCG=8PD8KA8xDWXo3WggdQ_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:40:17 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
        Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] kunit: mptcp: adhear to KUNIT formatting standard

Hi David,

On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 6:24 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
> > Like patch 1/6, I can apply it in MPTCP tree and send it later to
> > net-next with other patches.
> > Except if you guys prefer to apply it in KUnit tree and send it to
> > linux-next?
>
> Given 1/6 is going to net-next, it makes sense to send this out that
> way too, then, IMHO.
> The only slight concern I have is that the m68k test config patch in
> the series will get split from the others, but that should resolve
> itself when they pick up the last patch.

I can apply the m68k test config patch when all other parts have
entered mainline.  Note that I would have made the same changes
myself anyway, on -rc1 defconfig refresh.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds