linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 028/103] scsi: scsi_transport_srp: Dont block target in SRP_PORT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210419130528.774177900@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:05:39 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 028/103] scsi: scsi_transport_srp: Dont block target in SRP_PORT_LOST state

From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.com>

[ Upstream commit 5cd0f6f57639c5afbb36100c69281fee82c95ee7 ]

rport_dev_loss_timedout() sets the rport state to SRP_PORT_LOST and the
SCSI target state to SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE. If this races with
srp_reconnect_work(), a warning is printed:

Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: dev_loss_tmo expired for SRP port-18:1 / host18.
Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: scsi_internal_device_block(18:0:0:100) failed: ret = -22
Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel: Call Trace:
Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel:  ? scsi_target_unblock+0x50/0x50 [scsi_mod]
Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel:  starget_for_each_device+0x80/0xb0 [scsi_mod]
Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel:  target_block+0x24/0x30 [scsi_mod]
Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel:  device_for_each_child+0x57/0x90
Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel:  srp_reconnect_rport+0xe4/0x230 [scsi_transport_srp]
Mar 27 18:48:07 ictm1604s01h4 kernel:  srp_reconnect_work+0x40/0xc0 [scsi_transport_srp]

Avoid this by not trying to block targets for rports in SRP_PORT_LOST
state.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401091105.8046-1-mwilck@suse.com
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
index 1e939a2a387f..98a34ed10f1a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ int srp_reconnect_rport(struct srp_rport *rport)
 	res = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rport->mutex);
 	if (res)
 		goto out;
-	if (rport->state != SRP_RPORT_FAIL_FAST)
+	if (rport->state != SRP_RPORT_FAIL_FAST && rport->state != SRP_RPORT_LOST)
 		/*
 		 * sdev state must be SDEV_TRANSPORT_OFFLINE, transition
 		 * to SDEV_BLOCK is illegal. Calling scsi_target_unblock()
-- 
2.30.2